|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2018 12:48:49 GMT
Not sure exactly where to post such things (as I am under the impression this is a typo/error. Perhaps there could be a section for such things found, to assist in new iterations of the book?). I have version 2.6, so if this has already been changed (if I am correct in my thoughts that this is an error, that is), I apologize. On page 57, beneath the table for Stamina Travel Results and Consequences, it reads as such: "The character also needs to test his Wil every Rest he tries to stay awake between 22:00 and 06:00 (e.g. to keep watch). The DD is 3 for Success, 6 for Semi-success, 9 for Failure, and 12 for Critical Failure..." Are these DDs backwards? I mean to say, shouldn't a higher Wil modifier make you more likely to stay awake?
Any help/feedback would be much appreciated, thank you.
EDIT: Nevermind, for some odd reason I was just not capable of interpreting this rule right at that moment...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2018 0:16:54 GMT
I'm not really familiar with the rules and mechanics yet.. since I haven't read the book. Just browsed through and read something here and there... but haven't got full idea of it...
But to me it looks like nothing is out of place.
That Wil check is (as I see it) just extra check after stamina check which determines how you did and the you use acording DD for the Wil check.
Correct me if I'm not understandong this right.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2018 4:47:07 GMT
After having read the rule in a new light, I understand now, and it seems perfectly fine. I guess that is what happens when you read a rule book until 7 in the morning when you should be asleep Thanks for the response man!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2018 10:00:36 GMT
No problem. These are good, made me look into the rulebook and such... this is how I have mostly read the dmaned thing :D
But to be honest there are some things that would be more undertandable with examples and some of the structure in the book is a bit hard to follow. Once one gets more familiar with the rules and the book that might change for better I would assume.
I'm really bad reading rulebooks from cover to cover I have to say.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2018 12:42:48 GMT
I am good with sitting down to read them, but I binge, and sometimes overlook the obvious in doing so! It takes all sorts, as they say.
|
|